Re: Update and Questions

[Noah Lavine]

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Nala Ginrut <address@hidden> wrote:
> well, I see. I haven't used Stalin before, so I guess the generated C code
> must be compiled without any Gcc extension?

I think he's making a joke that Richard Stallman is always pedantic,
so the -pedantic flag is redundant.

> @Noah: Anyway, will you add r5rs support to it? I found Stalin doesn't
> provide that.

I would love to. That is far in the future, though - my current goal
is to type-check Tree-IL. I have been working on that, and I think I
am close to having something ready to show, although not quite there.
Expect an email about the wip-compiler branch in the next few days.

Noah

> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:00 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Nala Ginrut <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > -pedantic? Sorry, but I'm afraid I didn't see it in Noah's
>> > description.
>> >
>> > Anyone give me some context?
>>
>> gcc has an option -pedantic for strict standard adherence.
>>
>> --
>> David Kastrup
>
>