Re: local-eval on syntax-local-binding, bound-identifiers

[David Kastrup]

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> What if instead we implemented closure serialization somehow?  Then we
> would handle procedural macros too, and bound-identifiers would still be
> sufficient.
>
> Maybe that idea is a little too crazy.

Are we still talking about Scheme?  The language with
call-with-current-continuation?  "a little too crazy" is not a
criterion.  "Too complex to work or or with" would be.  Those are
related, but not necessarily the same.

-- 
David Kastrup