[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compiler Branch
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: Compiler Branch |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:49:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Heya Noah,
A brief note:
On Sun 08 Jan 2012 22:15, Noah Lavine <address@hidden> writes:
> I do think there's a problem with plain CPS, though - it forces you to
> pick an order for the evaluation of function arguments. I would like
> to use CPS with some sort of parallel-call operator, so we can leave
> the order undefined (maybe at some point an optimizer will want to
> adjust the order). What do you think?
>
> I also noticed that at the end of that blog post you said you were
> considering ANF versus CPS for Guile (I assume you'd already decided
> that you didn't like Tree-IL). Does this mean you decided on CPS?
I guess I'd like to see if it's a good idea or not. We definitely do
need a parallel binding operator. I haven't already decided on it but I
am interested.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/