[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: syntax-local-binding
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: syntax-local-binding |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:26:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue 24 Jan 2012 11:30, Peter TB Brett <address@hidden> writes:
> It seems pretty clear to me that the only (debatable) downside to using
> Mark's implementation is that some definitions end up in the "wrong"
> module, while your implementation has several potentially *major*
> problems (including the necessity of providing universally unique
> gensyms)
Let's be clear here: the universally-unique gensym issue is something
that Guile *already* has, in version 2.0.0, 2.0.1, etc.
Regards,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- Re: syntax-local-binding, (continued)
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Mark H Weaver, 2012/01/20
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/01/21
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Andy Wingo, 2012/01/23
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Mark H Weaver, 2012/01/23
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Andy Wingo, 2012/01/23
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Mark H Weaver, 2012/01/23
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Andy Wingo, 2012/01/24
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Noah Lavine, 2012/01/24
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Peter TB Brett, 2012/01/24
- Re: syntax-local-binding, David Kastrup, 2012/01/24
- Re: syntax-local-binding,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Mark H Weaver, 2012/01/24
- mark uniqueness (Was: Re: syntax-local-binding), Andy Wingo, 2012/01/24
- Re: mark uniqueness, Mark H Weaver, 2012/01/24
- Re: mark uniqueness, Andy Wingo, 2012/01/25
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Andy Wingo, 2012/01/24
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Mark H Weaver, 2012/01/24
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2012/01/25
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Andy Wingo, 2012/01/25
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Ludovic Courtès, 2012/01/25
- Re: syntax-local-binding, Mark H Weaver, 2012/01/25