Re: manual examples - self contained or not?

[Noah Lavine]

Hello,

> My vote would be for self-contained: it can be copied directly into a
> file or REPL and executed, and IMO reduces confusion. I already try to
> do this when posting any examples on paste.lisp.org or in a gist.

When you say "self-contained", do you mean that if the example uses a
procedure from a module, it should have a (use-modules ...) statement?
If so, that sounds good to me.

If you mean that most examples should never use procedures that are in
modules, that seems a little restrictive.

Noah