[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: syntax closures
From: |
Stefan Israelsson Tampe |
Subject: |
Re: syntax closures |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:06:27 +0100 |
Hi wingo:
Yes this is something I can do. But on a second thought I can't find a way to
handle unsyntax-splicing without a splicing macro. Modding #, and not #,@
just screams for difficult errors to show up. Therefor I will in stead
just write
another macro unsyntax-72 that people can use.
btw, I tried to get gnus working but cannot send mail from it :-(
/Stefan
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue 22 Jan 2013 17:19, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> > (read-hash-extend #\_ syntax-closure-reader)
>>>
>>> Have you tried having your srfi-72 module export a binding for unsyntax?
>>
>> I would like to use that of cause, but does it mix well with other
>> already written code?
>
> It should work in a modular fashion. #,foo reads as (unsyntax foo), and
> the meaning of that depends on the binding of unsyntax that is current.
>
> Andy
> --
> http://wingolog.org/
- syntax closures, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2013/01/17
- Re: syntax closures, Andy Wingo, 2013/01/22
- Re: syntax closures, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2013/01/22
- Re: syntax closures, Andy Wingo, 2013/01/22
- Re: syntax closures,
Stefan Israelsson Tampe <=
- Re: syntax closures, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2013/01/22
- Re: syntax closures, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2013/01/23
- Re: syntax closures, Alex Shinn, 2013/01/23
- Re: syntax closures, Stefan Israelsson Tampe, 2013/01/24
- Re: syntax closures, Alex Shinn, 2013/01/24