Re: guile projects database conversion status

[Bobby D. Bryant]

thi wrote:

> oops, thanks for the reminder; i did see that post but it slipped my
> mind.... sorry about that.  yes, a new category is a good idea.
> however, i think "bindings" might be too general a term.  i notice that
> the Ada bindings are for the gh interface.  how do these proposed
> categories strike you?
>
>   Export/Libguile
>   Export/Libguile-High
>   Export/[whatever-other-subset-of-libguile]
>
> this keeps a guile-centric view of things and allows for later
> modularization.  although i like the term "Export", i'm not attached to
> whatever comes after the slash; since you are breaking new ground, feel
> free to suggest other ideas.

That's fine; I agree that "bindings" would be ambiguous between binding
something to GUILE vs. binding GUILE to something else, so "Export" is
probably a good term for the top-level category.

The breakdown in subcategories is fine by me, too.

Thanks,
Bobby