Re: Moving libglade into guile-gtk ?

[Bill Gribble]

On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 13:51, MJ Ray wrote:
> Yeah, gnome/gtk may be rather heavy for it... I'm quite pleased with what
> I've seen of guile-gtk, but if there was a glade editor which didn't require
> the gnome outhouse, it would be better yet.

I'm not sure what you mean by this. Debian has 'glade' and 'glade-gnome'
packages which are with and without Gnome support.  Is that what you
mean?  Or were you talking about the guile (gtk libglade) module being
part of guile-gnome rather than guile-gtk? 

(btw, there's no need to be so pejorative about Gnome.  Lots of guile
contributors are also Gnome contributors.  I won't piss on your carpet,
please don't piss on mine.)

b.g.