[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Weak hash tables are too strong?
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: Weak hash tables are too strong? |
Date: |
03 Feb 2002 17:07:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft) |
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
> Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > my (admittedly vague) recollection of the problem is that
> > recently-printed things tend to stick in memory. you print more
> > stuff, they go away.
>
> Hmm, that doesn't sound too good. Is there a known reason for this?
> Maybe the print_state pool is to blame, but I can't imagine right now
> how it should manage to do it.
that was it, I think.
you could just define the current situation to be OK, though. after
all, even in CL you have all those nice '+', '*' etc. thingies you can
type at the listener to refer to the results of previous computations.
in short, it's a feature if you know how to look at it the right
way. :)
--
All ITS machines now have hardware for a new machine instruction --
CIZ
Clear If Zero.
Please update your programs.