Re: 1.6.0 problems with libguilereadline-v-12 and fix

[Rob Browning]

address@hidden (Paul Jarc) writes:

> I know that this is a very unusual way of doing things, but it works
> very well most of the time.  I get the benefits of package management
> along with the benefits of building from source.

OK, now I follow.  Unusual yes, but I can see why it might work well
for you.

> Well, Debian's installation of Guile will be in /usr, won't it?  So
> it won't need rpath anyway.  I'm not saying that Guile should be
> unable to find its libraries without rpath, but if rpath is set,
> libltdl (and thus Guile) should use it the same way ld.so would, in
> the same order, etc.

I think that's something we can all agree on -- consistent behavior
between ld.so and libltdl could only help :>

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD