[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions
|
From: |
Rob Browning |
|
Subject: |
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions |
|
Date: |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:18:02 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) |
MJ Ray <address@hidden> writes:
>> Should be. Ideally, that might be encouraged via a suitable SRFI.
>> Wonder if pregexp might be appropriate...
>
> Let's see what people say here for a bit and what the author's
> response is, then cls, then SRFI?
He's fine with the assignment if we need one. I'll play around with
the code.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, (continued)
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Rob Browning, 2003/04/28
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, tomas, 2003/04/28
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Rob Browning, 2003/04/28
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, MJ Ray, 2003/04/28
- Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], tomas, 2003/04/29
- Re: Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], Thamer Al-Harbash, 2003/04/29
- Re: Low level things in C or Scheme, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2003/04/29
- Re: Low level things in C or Scheme, Ken Anderson, 2003/04/29
Re: Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], Robert Uhl, 2003/04/30