[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: continuation?

From: Bill Schottstaedt
Subject: Re: continuation?
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 05:08:11 -0700

> A continuation is just a procedure.  It is not guaranteed to be
> distinguishable from an "ordinary" procedure.

It is not "just a procedure" -- it has all kinds
of extra semantics -- can give me some reference
to a discussion about this?  I'd say the compiler's problems
are irrelevant at this level -- how is an error handler supposed
to tell that it has received a "real" continuation (which would
continue...) as opposed to "just a procedure" (which would not)?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]