[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: null terminated strings
From: |
Roland Orre |
Subject: |
Re: null terminated strings |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:27:15 +0100 |
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 22:02, Paul Jarc wrote:
>> Tom Lord <address@hidden> wrote:
>> mutation-effects-both shared substrings are an improvement to Scheme.
>>
> Unless you're a fan of pure functional languages, of course.
>From my point of view fans of pure functional languages will not
usually see much of the reality. At least not as long as we are
speaking (semi-)interpreted languages as guile, even though I
myself, as being a quite imperative scheme programmer often looses
in contests with a clever functional programmer...
Roland Orre
- Re: argz SMOB, (continued)
- Re: argz SMOB, Brian S McQueen, 2004/01/15
- Re: argz SMOB, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/15
- null terminated strings (was: argz SMOB), Andreas Voegele, 2004/01/16
- Message not available
- Re: null terminated strings, Andreas Voegele, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Roland Orre, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Andreas Voegele, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Brian S McQueen, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Tom Lord, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/16
- Re: null terminated strings,
Roland Orre <=
- Re: null terminated strings, Ken Anderson, 2004/01/19
- Re: null terminated strings, Per Bothner, 2004/01/19
- Re: null terminated strings, Ken Anderson, 2004/01/19