[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Guile-user Digest, Vol 21, Issue 16

From: Paul Jarc
Subject: Re: Guile-user Digest, Vol 21, Issue 16
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:36:44 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

Bruce Korb <address@hidden> wrote:
> On the other hand, I never have figured out why that is considered
> preferable to something like the following.  All those weirdo
> macro things are very distracting:

FUNC_NAME must be defined if you want to use SCM_VALIDATE_*.  (I
wonder why it's not SCM_FUNC_NAME.)  SCM_DEFINE is recognized by
guile-snarf; without it, you'll have to code the initialization call
to scm_c_define_gsubr yourself (far away from the function itself, so
it's easy for them to get out of sync) along with whatever it is that
registers the docstring.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]