[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Modified load-path proposal
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: Modified load-path proposal |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:20:35 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:
> What advantage is this over putting a symlink in /usr/share/guile/site
> to point to this alternate location?
Nothing really compelling, perhaps, but...
- some OSs don't have symlinks (i.e. Windows)
- the symlink approach doesn't work if a package installed with one
prefix wants to install (database mysql) and a different package
with a different prefix wants to install (database postgres)
- in my view, installing an init.d file (under $sysconfdir) feels less
polluting of the distribution-managed part of the filesystem than
putting a symlink into /usr/share/guile/site.
> What is the wherever/my/scheme/files/are directory likely to be?
> Guile library packages wouldn't be sprayed randomly across all four
> corners of the disk would they?
In practice I would guess not. Most distribution-managed packages
would go into /usr/share/guile, and most home-built packages into
/usr/local/share/guile, I'd guess. What is your concern, though?
Neil
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, (continued)
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/22
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/28
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal,
Neil Jerram <=
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Greg Troxel, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
Re: Modified load-path proposal, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/14