Re: Issues using statprof (no samples taken)

[Boris Zbarsky]

Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Boris Zbarsky <address@hidden> writes:
> > That doesn't seem to have any effect.  Interestingly, if I change the
> > setitimer call but NOT the sigaction call I see the program terminate
> > with an uncaught SIGPROF...  So clearly the sigaction is having _some_
> > effect.  Just not that of calling the handler.  ;)
>
> Aaarg.

That's about how I feel.

> However, it would help if you used 1.8, as I'm not sure exactly how 1.6
> differs in that respect.  According to
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165492 , it is feasible to just
> switch to 1.8 and keep GnuCash happy.

I'll see if I can manage this, but 
http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/MacOSX/MacPortsDetail#guile_1.8.1 doesn't 
fill me with hope.  It'll certainly involve me hacking around in the 
Macports gnucash and recompiling it to look for "guile" as oppposed to 
"guile16" at the very least...  It also sounds like I'll need to compile 
guile 1.8 with some non-default options, at least according to those 
gentoo bug reports.  :(

-Boris