[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: statically linking in srfi modules
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: statically linking in srfi modules |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:38:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130005 (Ma Gnus v0.5) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:
> I guess the main thing for us to do upstream is to ensure that
> --disable-shared works properly without such workarounds. Fortunately
> this is mostly not an issue in Guile 2, because the SRFI-1 and SRFI-60
> libraries have been moved into the core. The only remaining
> dynamically-loaded extension bundled with Guile 2 is for readline.
> It would be good to fix that at some point.
I don’t think it should be “fixed” because (1) it’s an optional feature,
and (2) it’s under the GPL whereas Guile is under LGPL.
Ludo’.
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, (continued)
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/09
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Richard Shann, 2013/02/10
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/10
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Richard Shann, 2013/02/10
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/10
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Richard Shann, 2013/02/11
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Richard Shann, 2013/02/11
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/11
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Richard Shann, 2013/02/12
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Mark H Weaver, 2013/02/12
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Richard Shann, 2013/02/09
- Re: statically linking in srfi modules, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/02/08