[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternative to scm_protects?
|
From: |
Devon Schudy |
|
Subject: |
Re: Alternative to scm_protects? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 3 Jul 2014 11:08:02 -0400 |
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Since Guile 2.0, which switched to BDW-GC, scm_protects has been mostly
> irrelevant because BDW-GC scans all the C global variables.
Oh, it's irrelevant because users can easily implement it themselves —
it's just a convenience now.
So at worst, Lilypond can simply reimplement protects, which is <1 page. Thanks.