[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiple values passed as single argument to procedure
From: |
dsmich |
Subject: |
Re: Multiple values passed as single argument to procedure |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Jun 2017 7:17:19 -0400 |
---- Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> wrote:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:
> >ument
> >> I'm sorry David, but _everything_ that you wrote below is incorrect.
> >
> > Well, let me try again. It's not all that easy to understand.
>
> You're obviously quite intelligent and knowledgeable, so it's probably
> my failure to explain it well more than anything else. We can try again
> together.
Thanks Mark for that most excellently lucid explanation! I had vague notions
before
but I have a much deeper appreciation now.
Back in the day, I used Forth a bit. Multiple arguments and multiple return
values
were pretty much the same thing. (the stack) And it was easy, because of the
syntax
of the language. Yeah, I agree, syntax is the main blocker here.
Thanks again!
-Dale
- Re: Multiple values passed as single argument to procedure, (continued)
- Re: Multiple values passed as single argument to procedure, David Kastrup, 2017/06/12
- Re: Multiple values passed as single argument to procedure, Mark H Weaver, 2017/06/12
- Re: Multiple values passed as single argument to procedure, David Kastrup, 2017/06/12
- Re: Multiple values passed as single argument to procedure, Mark H Weaver, 2017/06/12
- Re: Multiple values passed as single argument to procedure, Mark H Weaver, 2017/06/12
- Re: Multiple values passed as single argument to procedure, Mark H Weaver, 2017/06/12
- Re: Multiple values passed as single argument to procedure,
dsmich <=
- Re: Multiple values passed as single argument to procedure, Alex Vong, 2017/06/26