[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lat? and atom? not in guile?
From: |
Joshua Branson |
Subject: |
lat? and atom? not in guile? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jun 2018 11:18:30 -0400 |
Hello,
This question comes from a non-scheme guy. I'm not trying to be
critical of guile. I'm just curious.
So I have the book "The Little Schemer". The book describes the
procedures: "lat?" and "atom?". Surprisingly, guile does not seem to
define these procedures by default. I had assumed that these procedures
were apart of standard scheme, but I guess that is not the case.
Is there any plan to define these procedures?
Thanks,
Joshua
- lat? and atom? not in guile?,
Joshua Branson <=
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile?, Thompson, David, 2018/06/19
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile?, Joshua Branson, 2018/06/20
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile?, John Cowan, 2018/06/20
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile?, Thompson, David, 2018/06/20
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile?, Joshua Branson, 2018/06/20
- Scheme books [was: lat? and atom? not in guile?], Matt Wette, 2018/06/20
- Re: Scheme books [was: lat? and atom? not in guile?], Joshua Branson, 2018/06/21
- Re: Scheme books [was: lat? and atom? not in guile?], Matt Wette, 2018/06/21
- Re: lat? and atom? not in guile?, Joshua Branson, 2018/06/20
Re: lat? and atom? not in guile?, John Cowan, 2018/06/19