Re: Bags

[Ludovic Courtès]

Alex Sassmannshausen <address@hidden> skribis:

> You could use something like 'parcels' (maybe too close in meaning to
> package) or 'containers' (maybe too long). Both would build on the idea
> that you can have packages inside a parcel, or container — much like bag
> probably does as well (as in santa clause's bag of presents/packages).

Actually I was trying to convey the idea that a “bag” is a “package”
with less ornamentation, if you see what I mean (because bags are
low-level representations of packages.)  So I think these suggestions
wouldn’t work well (and “containers” could be confused with Linux
containers.)

Thanks anyway.  :-)

Ludo’.