Re: 'sudoers' vs. 'hosts-file'

[Daniel Pimentel]

On 2015-06-15 09:17, Alex Kost wrote:
> Daniel Pimentel (2015-06-15 01:52 +0300) wrote:
>
> > On 2015-06-14 09:47, Alex Kost wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Since there is no real difference between 'sudoers' and 'hosts-file'
> > > fields (of operating-system declaration), what about renaming one of
> > > them?  So it could be either:
> > >
> > >   'sudoers-file' and 'hosts-file'
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > >   'sudoers' and 'hosts'
> > >
> > > (I prefer the latter variant)
> >
> > Host file is trust relationship (for example host, IP). The sudoers is
> > user/group that can use binary command as root (for example ifconfig, 
> > dd
> > and other).
>
> I didn't meant that those files are the same, I wanted to say that
> 'sudoers' and 'hosts-file' fields of 'operating-system' record should 
> be
> named in the same manner as they are both file-like objects.  Sorry for
> the confusion.
All right :)
--
Daniel Pimentel (d4n1)
GnuPG (0B1A1914)
FSF (13054)