|
From: | 韋嘉誠 |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] gnu: Update pumpa to 0.9.1. |
Date: | Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:31:11 +0200 |
On Jul 9, 2015 7:49 PM, "Mathieu Lirzin" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> One last thing before pushing. :)
>
> Following the
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-07/msg00235.html
> discussion, I want to know if the usage of the email address
> <address@hidden> instead of
> <address@hidden> in your patch was intentionnal?
Do you mean the opposite? I use gnu@ on the list, but I would like my patches (and AUTHORS) to use @greatsino. I think that's what I did?
> PS: There is no need to use "git send-mail ..." here. Just attach the
> file generated by "git format-patch origin/master" to your answer.
The advantage I see with git send-mail is that the patch is readable inline when reading the list archive and list mail, and in the case of a multi-step patch it neatly groups patches together ... when you do it right.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |