Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages

[Ludovic Courtès]

Alex Kost <address@hidden> skribis:

> From e040b70e23f04fca1c91123751ce8b6e28719bb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Kost <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 11:12:28 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: bash-light: Rename to bash-minimal.
>
> * gnu/packages/bash.scm (bash-light): Rename to ...
>   (bash-minimal): ...this.
>   (static-bash): Use it.
> * gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm (%bash-static): Use it.

This should go to ‘core-updates’, where there’s an additional reference
to update in commencement.scm.  OK with this change.

> From 3deea5ea0cc104993ab665863105d7ad672f5ea0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Kost <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 11:23:30 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: wpa-supplicant-light: Rename to wpa-supplicant-minimal.
>
> * gnu/packages/admin.scm (wpa-supplicant-light): Rename to ...
>   (wpa-supplicant-minimal): ...this.
>   (wpa-supplicant): Use it.
> * gnu/system/install.scm (installation-os): Use it.

OK for ‘master’.

Thanks,
Ludo’.