[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-libxml and bioruby.
From: |
Pjotr Prins |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-libxml and bioruby. |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:44:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 08:58:28AM -0400, Thompson, David wrote:
> > + (home-page "http://bioruby.org/")
> > + ;; Code is released under Ruby license, except for setup
> > + ;; (LGPLv2.1+), scripts in samples (GPL2 and GPL2+)
> > + (license (list license:ruby license:lgpl2.1+ license:gpl2
> > + license:gpl2+ ))))
>
> Wouldn't this make the collective work GPL2+? Ludo or Mark, can you
> weigh in here?
I don't think so. 98% of the code is under the Ruby license, including
the libraries and the Ruby shell. Only a few small scripts have other
licenses. I would argue these scripts are hardly used, including setup
:)
Pj.
- [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-libxml and bioruby., Pjotr Prins, 2015/09/15
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-libxml and bioruby., Thompson, David, 2015/09/15
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-libxml and bioruby., Pjotr Prins, 2015/09/15
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-libxml and bioruby., Thompson, David, 2015/09/15
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-libxml and bioruby., Pjotr Prins, 2015/09/17
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-libxml, Pjotr Prins, 2015/09/17
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-libxml, Thompson, David, 2015/09/19
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-libxml and bioruby., Pjotr Prins, 2015/09/17
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-libxml and bioruby., Thompson, David, 2015/09/19
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-libxml and bioruby.,
Pjotr Prins <=