guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/3] add c-ares and aria2


From: Efraim Flashner
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] add c-ares and aria2
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 15:33:24 +0200

On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:19:53 +0200
Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Tue, 03 Nov 2015 14:35:07 +0100
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> 
> > Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> skribis:
> >   
> > > This patch has driven me crazy a bit. C-ares is a library for 
> > > asynchronous DNS
> > > lookups, and aria2 is a cli program to download multiple files/torrents
> > > simultaneously, and also a git-annex dependency. C-ares builds without any
> > > problems, but aria2 was a different story. The first problem is that the 
> > > tests
> > > seem to need network connectivity, and it tries to access files outside 
> > > the
> > > build chroot. Disabling the tests was the easy part.    
> > 
> > It’s cheating!  ;-)  Could you investigate and see whether/how tests
> > could run in the build environment?  A common problem wrt. networking in
> > host name lookups.  In the build environment, only “localhost” can be
> > found.
> >   
--
> > 
> > Ludo’.  
> 
> In the end rebuilding c-ares with the release tarball and not the github
> tarball fixed the issues with aria2 not recognizing c-ares. I wasn't able to
> get anything more out of aria2, more than it not finding the locations and
> leaving me with with variables pointing to /path/to/dir and the like.
> 

here's the end of the log file:

##Failure Location unknown## : Error
Test name: N5aria224LpdMessageDispatcherTestE::testSendMessage
uncaught exception of type N5aria29DlAbortExE
- Failed to set a socket option, cause: No such device

LpdMessageReceiverTest.cc:34:Assertion
Test name: N5aria222LpdMessageReceiverTestE::testReceiveMessage
assertion failed
- Expression: rcv.init("")

Failures !!!
Run: 979   Failure total: 2   Failures: 1   Errors: 1
FAIL aria2c (exit status: 1)

the way it's presented in the command line, however, is that there was 1 test, 
and 1 fail, making it harder to figure out what was going on.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <address@hidden>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

Attachment: pgpnvkIhSctpS.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]