[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] gnu: unison: Add "doc" output.
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] gnu: unison: Add "doc" output. |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 11:39:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Bavier <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 23:11:07 +0100
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> Eric Bavier <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>> > +(define (unison-doc ext version hash)
>> > + (origin
>> > + (method url-fetch)
>> > + (uri (string-append "https://www.seas.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/"
>> > + "download/releases/unison-" version "/unison-"
>> > + version "-manual." ext))
>> > + (sha256 (base32 hash))))
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > + `(("doc-pdf"
>> > + ,(unison-doc "pdf" version
>> > +
>> > "0y5mywjn352nw4wqli94gnc5vn1f72g56jqqk1nqajz0ark998nb"))
>> > + ("doc-ps"
>> > + ,(unison-doc "ps" version
>> > +
>> > "11awy1xxhmckwnx42hllmngmx8q4ck18vpwpgfqqhj0x8vx0b3ha"))
>> > + ("doc-html"
>> > + ,(unison-doc "html" version
>> > +
>> > "06myrpv067j5ffm265fm0a83gm41j9bv3ps3yiyb1hqgfy1qy3ah"))))
>>
>> Could we instead build them from source?
>
> Possibly. The documentation source is not available in the download
> tarball, only in the developer svn repository, so we could do an svn
> fetch of that. Would that be alright?
Sure.
>> I understand that building the PDF/PS would require an extra dependency
>> on TeX Live. This could be:
>>
>> 1. ignored, on the grounds that people with substitutes enabled will
>> not have to download TeX Live; or:
>>
>> 2. addressed by having only the HTML documentation built, on the
>> grounds the HTML is more appropriate for on-screen reading.
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> Option 1 might be fine. The 'coq' package also requires both texlive
> and hevea for its documentation.
OK!
Ludo’.