Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm-llnl.

[Ricardo Wurmus]

Pjotr Prins <address@hidden> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:33:30PM -0600, Eric Bavier wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:36:48 +0100
>> Pjotr Prins <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>> > * gnu/packages/parallel.scm (slurm-llnl): New variable.
>> > ---
>> >  gnu/packages/parallel.scm | 51 
>> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> >  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> [...]
>> > +   (license license:openssl)))
>> 
>> There are several bits in the 'contribs' directory that seem to not be
>> under free licenses. E.g.
>> 
>> - contribs/cray/slurmconfgen_smw.py contains "Copyright 2015 Cray Inc.
>>   All Rights Reserved"
>> 
>> - contribs/cray/slurmconfgen.py.in contains "Copyright 2013 Cray Inc.
>>   All Rights Reserved"
>> 
>> - contribs/cray/libalps_test_programs.tar.gz contains a mixture of
>>   GPLv2, public domain, and binaries.
>> 
>> - contribs/mic/mpirun-mic declares no license.
>> 
>> - contribs/pmi2 is under a custom (copyleft?) license.
>> 
>> - contribs/sgather declares no license.
>> 
>> - contribs/sgi/netloc_to_topology.c contains "Copyright (C) 2014
>>   Silicon Graphics International Corp. All rights reserved."
>> 
>> - contribs/sjobexit/sjobexitmod.pl declares no license.
>> 
>> I don't think we can claim any of these are covered under the same
>> license as slurm, since the COPYING file explicitely says "Some tools
>> in the "contribs" directory have other licenses."
>> 
>> The contribs tools are not installed by default, but we do need to
>> remove any non-free source from there with an origin snippet.
>> 
>> Also, I found the DISCLAIMER file contains the "or (at your option) any
>> later version." verbiage, so the slurm license itself is license:gpl2+
>
> That was hard to find. Initially I had gpl2+ but they don't include the
> license in the source so I defaulted to the license they include which
> is openssl. But ja...
>
> I agree the rest is a mess but we aren't building contrib. Do you have
> an example of a package that does this the right way?

The best way is to remove the contrib directory in an origin snippet.
We’re doing the same in the “shogun” package (in machine-learning.scm)
as the upstream sources contain files that are not free software.  The
snippet in “shogun” is probably more complicated than what you’ll need
for slurm-llnl; in many cases it’s enough to just do

    (begin
      (delete-file-recursively "contrib")
      #t)

in a snippet.

~~ Ricardo