Re: Staying on top of Qt security

[Leo Famulari]

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 09:43:49PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> Hi Leo,
> 
> thanks for your initiative!
> 
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 03:01:43PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > I think we need a Qt champion(s) for Guix.
> 
> I am not volunteering, mainly because I am not a Qt champion (but I am
> interested in the package).
> 
> > $ guix refresh -l qt-4                        
> > Building the following 18 packages would ensure 24 dependent packages
> > are rebuilt: soprano-2.9.4 python2-pyqt-4.11.4 polkit-qt-1-0.112.0
> > frescobaldi-2.18.1 keepassx-2.0.2 hydrogen-0.9.5.1 strigi-0.7.8
> > attica-0.4.2 pumpa-0.9.2 libdbusmenu-qt-0.9.2 phonon-4.8.3
> > brdf-explorer-17 gpsbabel-1.5.0 librecad-2.0.6-rc
> > alsa-modular-synth-2.1.2 qtractor-0.7.3 ardour-4.4 jalv-1.4.6
> 
> Some of them have no dependent packages, and I think they are mainly or
> exclusively used for KDE-4, which I started packaging a while ago (and
> dropped again when I got my Novena, as it turns out that KDE is too
> resource demanding). In any case, we would package KDE-5 now, and I would
> suggest to simply remove these packages. There are traces in git, so if
> it turns out we will need them in the end, we can still revive them.
> This concerns:
> attica soprano strigi polkit-qt automoc4 qjson libdbusmenu-qt
> So while we are it it, I suggest to simply remove kde.scm (there is no use
> in keeping a lonely oxygen-icons around...).
> 
> Also, python2-pyqt has no dependent package.
> 
> I looked at frescobaldi; they claim that a Qt-5 port is on the TODO list
> for their version 3, but without giving any timings.
> 
> If there is no outcry, I will remove the above-mentioned packages/modules.
> 
> Could maybe people using the other packages have a look at them?

I noticed that Efraim has upgraded a few qt-4 dependencies so that they
can use qt(-5).

> 
> Chris, what about pumpa?
> 
> Andreas
>