guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gnunet-gtk: adds --with-gnunet to configure-flags


From: Nils Gillmann
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnunet-gtk: adds --with-gnunet to configure-flags
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:58:08 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:

> Nils Gillmann <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I'll ask on gnunet-dev about this, but it might be that we have
>> to decide wether to default to some svn of gnunet, as 0.10.1 is
>> really old. Stable, but old.. Which possibly could affect the
>> experience for people who try to use gnunet now, before any
>> applications like secushare are running on it. plus you need -svn
>> if you want to hack on or testrun application which develop on
>> top of / inside gnunet.
>>
>> Guix should provide a stable experience, but if stable means too
>> old to deliver a useable experience of an still in development
>> network, what do we suggest? I would not replace gnunet and
>> gnunet-gtk, I would just make gnunet-svn the default (gnunet will
>> default to gnunet-svn) and gnunet-0.10.1 will have to be
>> installed explicitly.
>> There are only a few open bugs until the next GNUnet release will
>> be done, but 0.10.1 is just terribly old.
>
> The reply to my bug report said something similar.  If version 0.10.1 is
> so old that upstream suggest taking the latest from SVN I suppose we
> should do this too.
>
> I do hope there will be a new release soon, though, as I don’t like to
> use some arbitrary SVN checkout.
>
> ~~ Ricardo

Me neither.
Jookia send me a package definition to work on, I already have
some work from back on gentoo to look at, so it's just a matter
of finding time now.
I might get it done any time between tomorrow and after/during
the weekend at logan CIJ symposium, working on that gnunet
change.

>From the looks of gnunet bugtracker, there are 4 open bugs I
think which are essential for cg to push for a new tarball
release. But, gnunet is a large mountain of code and I prefer the
smaller mountains of code and discussion I am involved in
somewhere inside the mountain. If someone is capable of fixing
gnunet bugs, https://gnunet.org/bugs/roadmap_page.php is the
place to go.

thanks,
-- 
ng
irc://loupsycedyglgamf.onion:67/~NiAsterisk
https://psyced.org:34443/NiAsterisk/
EDN: https://wiki.c3d2.de/Echt_Dezentrales_Netz/en




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]