[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] Suggest `guix.scm' for upstream maintainers.
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
[PATCH] Suggest `guix.scm' for upstream maintainers. |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Mar 2016 22:20:22 +0100 |
Hi,
In reference to ponderings on #guix, find minor doc patch attached.
Greetings,
Jan
>From fc6dd2108dae76e09e1bfcd6d04c36943469434f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:18:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Suggest `guix.scm' for upstream maintainers.
* doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix package): Suggest `guix.scm'.
---
doc/guix.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index 06b40fa..f23c7fc 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ As an example, @var{file} might contain a definition like
this
@verbatiminclude package-hello.scm
@end example
-Developers may find it useful to include such a @file{package.scm} file
+Developers may find it useful to include such a @file{guix.scm} file
in the root of their project source tree that can be used to test
development snapshots and create reproducible development environments
(@pxref{Invoking guix environment}).
--
2.6.3
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
- [PATCH] Suggest `guix.scm' for upstream maintainers.,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=