Re: 01/01: gnu: custom-gcc: Delete broken or conflicting executables.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> skribis:

> Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:

[...]

>> I’ll investigate this.  It’s odd that “-lgfortran” cannot be found only
>> because we deleted useless wrappers.
>
> I found that for randomjungle the native inputs must now also include
>
>     ("gfortran" ,gfortran "lib")
>
> in *addition* to the usual
>
>     ("gfortran" ,gfortran)
>
> I can prepare a patch for the three broken packages, but I wonder why
> this is necessary.  “gfortran” alone does not install “libgfortran.so”,
> only the “lib” output does.

For GCC we hack the “lib” spec (as show by ‘gcc -dumpspecs’) so that it
has an extra -L for libgcc_s (search for ‘GNU_USER_TARGET_LIB_SPEC’ in
gcc.scm).

Should something similar be done here?

Ludo’.