[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] Fix gfortran (?)
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
[PATCH] Fix gfortran (?) |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:16:20 +0100 |
Hi Guix,
with this patch applied I can build randomjungle without having to add
the “lib” output of gfortran to the package inputs.
This is related to the changes I pushed in commit 82f145e to fix
bug#19733, which seems to have broken the build of randomjungle and
slepc, among others.
Is this acceptable? Should we do this for all gfortran variants then?
~~ Ricardo
>From f3d97b7f1f2b597f7f74b2f59212f241a87fa602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:09:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gfortran: Disable separate "lib" output.
* gnu/packages/gcc.scm (gfortran): Disable separate "lib" output.
---
gnu/packages/gcc.scm | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gcc.scm b/gnu/packages/gcc.scm
index 1df5150..341c30c 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gcc.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/gcc.scm
@@ -474,7 +474,8 @@ as the 'native-search-paths' field."
(define-public gfortran
(custom-gcc gcc "gfortran" '("fortran")
- %generic-search-paths))
+ %generic-search-paths
+ #:separate-lib-output? #f))
(define-public gfortran-5
(custom-gcc gcc-5 "gfortran" '("fortran")
--
2.1.0
- [PATCH] Fix gfortran (?),
Ricardo Wurmus <=