|
From: | Alex Kost |
Subject: | Why do we use ".../share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d/"? |
Date: | Sun, 08 May 2016 13:33:10 +0300 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
I should have asked this when emacs-build-system was introduced. Why does it put emacs packages in sub-directories of "/share/emacs/site-lisp/guix.d"? It looks more natural to me just to use "/share/emacs/site-lisp". I don't see any potential conflicts here: some packages will put their elisp files right in the site-lisp dir (gnu-build-system does it by default), and emacs-build-system can just use "/share/emacs/site-lisp/<package>" sub-directories. "guix.d" seems redundant to me. What do people think? -- Alex
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |