[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rebasing core-updates-next branch
From: |
Manolis Ragkousis |
Subject: |
Re: Rebasing core-updates-next branch |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:57:34 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 |
Hello,
On 07/12/16 10:29, Alex Kost wrote:
> Is there a reason for this? Are you going to commit something there
> that needs to be based on core-updates? If it's just the "time to do
> that", then I think it's not really needed.
Yes my work is based on commits from core-updates and in order to push
Hurd related patches to core-updates-next I need to update it.
On 07/12/16 09:04, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Do we need to rebase? Is a merge not possible?
>
It's definitely possible but I agree with Ludo on this. It's better to
avoid unnecessary merge commits.
Btw I just noticed that commit bd46fdc is not signed by anyone. How
should I handle this one?
Thank you,
Manolis
- Rebasing core-updates-next branch, Manolis Ragkousis, 2016/07/11
- Re: Rebasing core-updates-next branch, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/11
- Re: Rebasing core-updates-next branch, Ben Woodcroft, 2016/07/12
- Re: Rebasing core-updates-next branch, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/07/12
- Re: Rebasing core-updates-next branch, Alex Kost, 2016/07/12
- Re: Rebasing core-updates-next branch,
Manolis Ragkousis <=
- Re: Rebasing core-updates-next branch, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/12