[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Review process
From: |
Pjotr Prins |
Subject: |
Re: Review process |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Jul 2016 04:24:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 06:02:48PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > I think I have covered that both in my writeup and in my response to
> > Ben. I think this work should be accepted as is.
>
> I find this unfair. You are not a newcomer, as proved by the fact that
> you’ve already identified weaknesses in the work you submit.
Exactly.
> Thus, that you post it anyway can be understood as “I know this and that
> should be done, but I’d rather let you do it on my behalf, kthxbye”.
>
> Or perhaps you’re suggesting that reviews are unnecessary, or that the
> points we insist on make little sense?
If have explained things why they are as they are with the Elixir
package. I have done my utmost to get the package to this stage. There
is some work pending fixing tests with upstream. All that is in the
open and happening.
> Well, I can tell you that as a user, I very much prefer that people who
> add packages to the distro have taken their time to make it lean and
> clean. This QA work that you dislike is a service that we developers do
> to users; it’s not something we do for the sake of elitism.
>
> I hope this can clear misunderstandings!
Thanks Ludo. As it stands I am no longer submitting packages to ML. I
did my utmost to make the package lean and clean. This package is not
going in.
But, I suggest you listen. I know at least 4 people here who say they
have trouble submitting to Guix. Good people.
You know I love Guix and I am a great admirer of all of you and I
certainly appreciate the energy you put into developing Guix and
reviews. I won't go away, but I am making clear why I am quitting
working in this way. Mind, I saw this coming. I actually quit
submitting packages half a year ago and instead worked through others.
I was interested to see if I would survive this one last attempt. In
the end my opinion on the state of the package conflicts with yours -
even though I am the expert on Elixir here and the conflict is not
about knowledge of Guix itself. Please read this last sentence again.
I'll have a think on how to proceed from here. I want to work with
those 4 people. And I want to attract more people from conda, brew
etc. I am convinced we need to change our ways. This state of affairs
does not sit well with me. To call it elitist was a provocation, but I
actually think there is some truth to it. The world is divided in
people who can do the dance, and those who can't (for whatever
reason). We need to find a way where the lesser people (like me) can
contribute.
Now, THAT would make it a brilliant project.
Pj.
- Re: none, (continued)
- Re: none, Roel Janssen, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Vincent Legoll, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, myglc2, 2016/07/22
- Re: none, Tomáš Čech, 2016/07/23
- Review process, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/22
- Re: Review process,
Pjotr Prins <=
- Re: Review process, Alex Kost, 2016/07/23
- Re: Review process, Mathieu Lirzin, 2016/07/23
- Re: Review process, Alex Kost, 2016/07/24
- Re: Review process, Mathieu Lirzin, 2016/07/24
- Re: Review process, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/24
- A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Pjotr Prins, 2016/07/23
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Pjotr Prins, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Pjotr Prins, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Mark H Weaver, 2016/07/24