[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Heads-up: git.sv.gnu.org now rejects unsigned commits
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Heads-up: git.sv.gnu.org now rejects unsigned commits |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:58:07 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) |
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:02:11PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
> On 07/25/2016 10:59 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > All the Guix repositories on Savannah now reject unsigned Git commits:
> >
> > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22883#112
> >
>
> This could probably be useful:
> https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Signing-Your-Work
>
>
> What will we do about patches sent by casual contributors, that will
> probably be unsigned? Should the committer sign them?
Yes. Signing a patch that is emailed is a separate action from signing a
Git commit (`git commit --gpg-sign`). Submitters are invited to sign
their emails, but those signatures will not appear in the Git repo.