[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: core-updates merged!
From: |
Manolis Ragkousis |
Subject: |
Re: core-updates merged! |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Aug 2016 10:15:58 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 |
Hello Leo
On 08/10/16 22:49, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Since this required me to re-sign these commits, will somebody please
> review the differences between WIP-core-updates and core-updates-next,
> to make sure I've done the right thing?
>
> When I get the "okay", I will rename the branch to core-updates, and
> then it will be "open for business" :)
Seems good to me. My local changes apply cleanly to the new branch and
my patches work as expected.
Thank you for taking care of this.
Manolis
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, (continued)
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Andreas Enge, 2016/08/06
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Andy Wingo, 2016/08/08
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Mike Gerwitz, 2016/08/07
- Re: ‘core-updates’ merge is a squashed commit, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/04
- Re: core-updates merged!, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/06
- Re: core-updates merged!, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/10
- Re: core-updates merged!,
Manolis Ragkousis <=
- Core-updates is ready for your patches!, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/13
- Re: core-updates merged!, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/08