[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 17/24] gnu: kwidgetsaddons: Fix test failure.
From: |
David Craven |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 17/24] gnu: kwidgetsaddons: Fix test failure. |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:08:35 +0200 |
> Might (setenv "QT_QPA_PLATFORM" "offscreen") also be enough?
Interesting, that also fixes the problem, but causes a new one...
********* Start testing of KDualActionTest *********
Config: Using QtTest library 5.7.0, Qt 5.7.0
(x86_64-little_endian-lp64 shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC
4.9.3)
PASS : KDualActionTest::initTestCase()
PASS : KDualActionTest::testSetGuiItem()
FAIL! : KDualActionTest::testSetIconForStates() Compared pointers are
not the same
Actual (action.inactiveIcon()): (nil)
Expected (icon) : 0x65a4d0
Loc:
[/tmp/guix-build-kwidgetsaddons-5.24.0.drv-0/kwidgetsaddons-5.24.0/autotests/kdualactiontest.cpp(56)]
PASS : KDualActionTest::testSetActive()
PASS : KDualActionTest::testTrigger()
PASS : KDualActionTest::cleanupTestCase()
Totals: 5 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted, 3ms
********* Finished testing of KDualActionTest *********
> Starting an Xvfb server and then not stopping it again is kinda ... extreme.
Since the tests are run in a container, I'd expect all processes started inside
the container to receive a sigterm when the container is (shutdown?).
> Also, who says that :1 is free?
Again since the tests are run in a container, I'd expect that there
isn't a xserver
running unless I explicitly start it.
Are my assumptions wrong?
Do you think it's worth tracking down the test failure when my solution works?
- Re: [PATCH 17/24] gnu: kwidgetsaddons: Fix test failure.,
David Craven <=