[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Superseded packages
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Superseded packages |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:18:33 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) |
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 10:39:08PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > There are other incompatibilities, for example in the repository format.
> > Borg provides a `borg upgrade` tool that performs a one-way conversion
> > of Attic repos to Borg repos. Just creating an 'attic -> borg' alias
> > would not be enough; any automated backup scripts would still fail.
>
> Then I don’t know. Either we mark Attic as superseded by Borg anyway,
> or we need another mechanism to mark a package as “discouraged”?
I've attached a patch that marks Attic as superseded by Borg. I'd like
to put it on core-updates. That way, we can mention it in the release
notes of the next Guix release, and hopefully people will notice the
change.
WDYT?
0001-gnu-attic-Superseded-by-borg.patch
Description: Text document
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Removing the attic package, (continued)
- Re: Removing the attic package, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/05
- Re: Removing the attic package, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/09/05
- Re: Removing the attic package, Efraim Flashner, 2016/09/05
- Re: Removing the attic package, ng0, 2016/09/05
- Re: Removing the attic package, ng0, 2016/09/05
- Superseded packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/06
- Re: Superseded packages, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/10
- Re: Superseded packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/11
- Re: Superseded packages, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/11
- Re: Superseded packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/11
- Re: Superseded packages,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: Superseded packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/23
- Re: Superseded packages, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/25
- Re: Superseded packages, Efraim Flashner, 2016/09/26
- Re: Superseded packages, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/27
- Re: Superseded packages, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/28
- Re: Superseded packages, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/28