|
From: | Hartmut Goebel |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Separate util-linux into three packages. |
Date: | Fri, 11 Nov 2016 15:43:32 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
Am 10.11.2016 um 22:14 schrieb John Darrington: > +(define-public util-linux/base > (package > - (name "util-linux") > + (name "util-linux-base") I'm in favour of naming the variable as the package. This eases using them. > +(define-public util-linux > + (package > + (inherit util-linux/base) > + (name "util-linux") > + (source (origin (inherit (package-source util-linux/base)))) I'm curious: Why do you need to inherit the package-source here? -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | address@hidden | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |