|
From: | Stefan Reichör |
Subject: | Re: Introduce packages/chess.el |
Date: | Thu, 12 Jan 2017 20:59:51 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes: > Stefan Reichör <address@hidden> writes: > >> Does someone provide feedback for this patch? >> Is it useful or is increasing the number of .scm files a bad thing? > > We usually avoid moving around packages unless there’s a very good > reason for it. One of the disadvantages of moving package expressions > is that it breaks existing manifest. > > Could your new chess-related packages be added to games.scm instead? > Thanks for your feedback. I had serveral reasons why I started this way: * I guessed it would be easier to do a split before adding more packages * Classifying packages in .scm files makes them easier to find * And it would be a commitment from me to provide these packages However - of course I have no problem in adding them to games.scm Stefan.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |