[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hardening (was: Re: tor: update to 0.2.9.9)
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Hardening (was: Re: tor: update to 0.2.9.9) |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:02:33 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) |
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 08:56:48PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> > Should we build Tor with "--enable-expensive-hardening"?
>
> I will take a look later what can be applied other than the
> default configure flags.
>
> I'm all for hardening, but it seems that the first basic ideas
> for Guix are stuck in the idea state.
As far as I can tell, --enable-expensive-hardening is specific to Tor,
so it's not relevant to the project of hardening all Guix packages.
> It would be great to see some movement on this during this
> year. I volunteer to help with it, though I don't have as much
> experience with SELinux (and only basic experience with
> GrSecurity without a modular kernel like GuixSD uses).
Yes, this effort needs a champion.
- tor: update to 0.2.9.9, contact . ng0, 2017/01/24
- [PATCH] gnu: tor: Update to 0.2.9.9., contact . ng0, 2017/01/24
- Re: tor: update to 0.2.9.9, Leo Famulari, 2017/01/24
- Hardening (was: Re: tor: update to 0.2.9.9), ng0, 2017/01/24
- Re: Hardening (was: Re: tor: update to 0.2.9.9),
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: Hardening (was: Re: tor: update to 0.2.9.9), ng0, 2017/01/24
- Re: Hardening (was: Re: tor: update to 0.2.9.9), ng0, 2017/01/24
- Re: Hardening (was: Re: tor: update to 0.2.9.9), Leo Famulari, 2017/01/24
- Re: Hardening (was: Re: tor: update to 0.2.9.9), ng0, 2017/01/24
- Re: Hardening (was: Re: tor: update to 0.2.9.9), ng0, 2017/01/24
- Re: Hardening, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/01/25
- Re: Hardening, ng0, 2017/01/30
- Re: Hardening, ng0, 2017/01/30
- Re: Hardening (was: Re: tor: update to 0.2.9.9), Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/01/25
- Re: Hardening, ng0, 2017/01/25