guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pyodbc-c.


From: ng0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pyodbc-c.
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 16:55:11 +0000

Danny Milosavljevic <address@hidden> writes:

> * gnu/packages/databases.scm (python-pyodbc-c, python2-pyodbc-c):
>   New variables.
> ---
>  gnu/packages/databases.scm | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/databases.scm b/gnu/packages/databases.scm
> index e8be17980..fc576888d 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/databases.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/databases.scm
> @@ -1312,3 +1312,29 @@ development.")
>      ;; test/crypto.test are licensed under a 3-clause BSD license. All other
>      ;; source files are in the public domain.
>      (license (list license:public-domain license:bsd-3))))
> +
> +(define-public python-pyodbc-c
> +  (package
> +    (name "python-pyodbc-c")
> +    (version "3.1.2")
> +    (source
> +     (origin
> +       (method url-fetch)
> +       (uri (string-append "https://gitlab.com/daym/pyodbc-c/repository/";
> +                           "archive.tar.gz?ref=v" version))
> +       (sha256
> +        (base32 "0nl11n3mgrcfnhimjqgv48rxqnb21l5m6s7p8ps2fa4nn4z6rzy0"))

I would put this as
(sha256
 (base32
  ""))
but I guess this works too as long as lint is happy.

> +       (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz"))))
> +    (build-system python-build-system)
> +    (inputs
> +     `(("unixodbc" ,unixodbc)))
> +    (arguments
> +     `(#:tests? #f ; no tests exist
> +      ))
> +    (home-page "https://github.com/mkleehammer/pyodbc";)

This is pulled from gitlab and the homepage is on gitlab? I think
it's better to use the gitlab repository as home-page then, or
what's the reason?

> +    (synopsis "Python ODBC Library")
> +    (description "This package provides a Python DB-API driver for ODBC.")

If I remember correctly, we should avoid starting synopsis and
description with words like "This". What about:

(description "@code{python-pyodbc-c} provides …"

> +    (license (license:x11-style "file://LICENSE.TXT"))))
> +
> +(define-public python2-pyodbc-c
> +  (package-with-python2 python-pyodbc-c))
>

Besides those small comments it looks good to me!
-- 
♥Ⓐ  ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]