Re: Reproducible installation images

[Ludovic Courtès]

Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:

> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>>> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>>
>>>> Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:
>>>>
>>>>> To enable independent verification of these installer images, it would
>>>>> be helpful to include the precise commands needed to reproduce these
>>>>> images, and the git commit to run them on.
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> The manual already gives those commands:
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Binary-Installation.html
>>>>  (bottom)
>>>>   
>>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Building-the-Installation-Image.html
>>>
>>> They give the commands, but they do not provide the git commit that you
>>> ran these commands on.
>>
>> True.  So the announcements could say something like:
>>
>>   See the “Binary Installation” and “Building the Installation Image”
>>   sections of the manual on how to recreate these binary images.  The
>>   ‘guix-binary’ tarballs were created from the ‘v0.14.0’ Git tag; the
>>   ‘guixsd-’ images were created from the tip of the ‘version-0.14.0’
>>   branch.
>
> This looks good, except for the "tip of the ‘version-0.14.0’ branch"
> reference, which may change over time.  Ideally, the commit references
> should be reliably immutable.
>
> What do you think?

Yes, you’re right.

This reminds me we should probably automate the announcement generation
entirely (à la Gnulib announce-gen but customized).

Ludo’.