Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK

[Chris Marusich]

Hi Gábor and Ricardo,

I see that Gábor made this GitHub issue to track their work:

https://github.com/Boskovits/guix/issues/16

At this point, can I help with anything in particular, or should I wait
until after Gábor pushes the fix(es) for java-hamcrest-core, so we can
build the covering of icedtea-8 after that and see what still breaks?

Gábor Boskovits <address@hidden> writes:

> I've found the problem with java-hamcrest-core.
> The root cause of this is that java-jarjar uses a bundled copy of asm,
> version 4.0.
> This asm version does not support icedtea8.
>
> I propose to use java-asm instead of the bundled one.
>
> In my opinion the best course of action should be:
> 1. create a package: java-asm-notest with tests diabled to break the
> dependency cycle on java-hamcrest-core
> 2. modify java-jarjar to use java-asm-notest instead of the bundled asm.
> 3. test if java-hamcrest-core now builds.
>
> It is a question if we want to iterate this cycle once more, with a
> tests-enabled java-asm.
> WDYT?

Sounds good to me.

Gábor Boskovits <address@hidden> writes:

> It seems, that it is aslo safe to apply this on master.
> This is the patch:
>
> ...
>
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Clean up depencies of java-asm.

This patch seems fine to me.  I briefly looked but could not find it in
the Guix Git repo; have you not pushed it yet?

Gábor Boskovits <address@hidden> writes:

> We now have an upstream fix for classpathx, it is pushed as revision 1244
> to the savannah subversion repo.
> May I change the source to use this revision?
> Or should I use a patch?
>
> I think using the upstream revision is a better option.
> WDYT?

I agree: using the upstream revision sounds like a better plan.  The
only reason I can think why we would not want to do that is if it is
going to take a long time for it to get released.

-- 
Chris

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature