[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 01/01: build-system/meson: Really skip the 'fix-runpath' phase on ar
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: 01/01: build-system/meson: Really skip the 'fix-runpath' phase on armhf. |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jul 2018 09:21:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:
> The end result is that the wishes of the x86_64-using majority are the
> only ones that seem to matter in this community, and other users are
> frequently left in a bad spot. This makes it increasingly unlikely that
> we'll ever gain a significant number of non-x86_64 users.
This kind of rant is really unhelpful. You’re shouting at someone who
*is* doing the work of keeping things running. And yes, when you do
that work, sometimes you have to choose between two suboptimal solutions
while waiting for a proper fix.
Generalizations about “this community” obviously make no sense. You are
a part of “this community” so it cares just as much as you do.
Please let’s work in a friendly manner towards finding solutions to the
problems.
Thank you,
Ludo’.
- Re: 01/01: build-system/meson: Really skip the 'fix-runpath' phase on armhf., Mark H Weaver, 2018/07/02
- Re: RFC: Portability should be a higher priority for Guix (was Re: 01/01: build-system/meson: Really skip the 'fix-runpath' phase on armhf.), Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/07/05
- Re: RFC: Portability should be a higher priority for Guix (was Re: 01/01: build-system/meson: Really skip the 'fix-runpath' phase on armhf.), Ludovic Courtès, 2018/07/05
- Re: RFC: Portability should be a higher priority for Guix (was Re: 01/01: build-system/meson: Really skip the 'fix-runpath' phase on armhf.), Andreas Enge, 2018/07/05
- Re: RFC: Portability should be a higher priority for Guix (was Re: 01/01: build-system/meson: Really skip the 'fix-runpath' phase on armhf.), Ludovic Courtès, 2018/07/05