[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11? |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Nov 2018 16:03:09 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 09:48:50PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> In my patchset, there are 2 kinds of fixes:
>
> - Disabling tests because Go 1.11 test policies are stricter and some lax code
> from before does not pass anymore.
> For this issue, upstream should fix their packages. As far as we are
> concerned, disabling tests is enough. The go-build-system has nothing to do
> with this issue.
Okay, I think you should go ahead and push these changes now, assuming
the packages still build afterwards.
> - Manual forwarding of compilation flags (e.g. "-tags"). This is an issue
> with
> our go-build-system which cannot re-use existing "pkg" objects on Go 1.11.
> Upstream code is fine.
>
> So yes, fixing go-build-system is related to packages not building with
> Go 1.11 :p
Okay, I see. I won't be working on this soon, if ever. I don't
understand enough about how Go >= 1.10 builds software in order to do
the work efficiently. Hopefully there is a volunteer :)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, (continued)
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/06
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/06
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/06
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/06
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/11
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/11
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/11
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/12
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/12