|
From: | swedebugia |
Subject: | Re: Octave & QtOctave |
Date: | Thu, 29 Nov 2018 17:21:31 +0100 |
On 2018-11-28 11:47, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Kei Kebreau <address@hidden> skribis:
snip
I agree with ng0 that Octave and its GUI interface should be kept in separate packages, as the difference in size is more than 5000 MiB. I also agree that the GUI package should be named "octave", but I don't know whether the CLI package should be named "octave-minimal" or "octave-cli". I find myself leaning toward "octave-cli" because the CLI package does include some non-essential dependencies.Makes sense to me. If others agree with this (“octave-cli” rather than “octave-minimal”), go ahead!
I agree. -- Cheers Swedebugia
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |