Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?

[Ricardo Wurmus]

zimoun <address@hidden> writes:

> I am not sure to understand what is the rule to attribute a package to
> bioinformatics.scm or to bioconductor.scm when it comes from
> Bioconductor.

bioinformatics.scm was there first.  Later I added bioconductor.scm
because I didn’t want bioinformatics.scm to eventually be full of R
packages.

New Bioconductor packages should go to bioconductor.scm.  Eventually we
may move all remaining R packages from bioinformatics to
bioconductor.scm.

> Last, there is not alphabetical order of the packages in the files.
> How the order is determined ?

Whichever package is added first comes first, later packages are usually
added to the bottom of the file.  The order has no significance.

--
Ricardo